Read Telehealth Requires Expansion of Physiciansã¢â‚¬â„¢ Communication Competencies Training
This is an Open Admission article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Introduction
Therapeutic radiographers undertaking on-treatment review clinics provide continuity of care for radiotherapy patients and reduce workloads for clinical oncologists and registrars. Reference Murray, Gilleece and Shepherd1 Radiographer-led review clinics assist the patient fully understand the written information regarding their treatment and assure them that their radiotherapy is integrated correctly into their overall handling plan. Radiographers monitor patients' radiotherapy tolerance, reactions and manage treatment-related toxicity including providing communication and treatment regarding radiation reactions. Reference Murray, Gilleece and Shepherd1 They co-ordinate the multidisciplinary team and make appropriate referrals to the Clinical Research Radiographer, Information and Support Radiographer, Macmillan Support and Information Service and a variety of allied health professionals. Since the beingness of COVID-xix, these beneficial clinics have had to adapt to ensure patients continue to receive information and back up during their treatment while limiting their potential exposure to COVID-19.
Telephone reviews for patients are non novel and indeed pre-COVID-xix were becoming an increasingly common feature in the mod healthcare setting. Reference Gonzalez, Cimadevila and Garcia-Comesaña2 'Telemedicine' is described equally activities involving 'two-way, existent-time interactive communication between the patient and practitioner at a distant site'. Reference Chaet, Clearfield, Sabin and Skimming3 They consist of three phases: gathering information, cognitive processing and output. Reference Chaet, Clearfield, Sabin and Skimmingiii This template is similar to the traditional structured contiguous interviews. Nowadays, in the post-COVID world, upwards of a quarter of all care consultations are conducted by phone. Reference Vaona, Pappas, Grewal, Ajaz, Majeed and Car4 One report suggests that telephone reviews tin finer supersede face-to-face reviews in roughly 10% of cases Reference Gonzalez, Cimadevila and Garcia-Comesaña2 ; the concern is that for the other 90%, telephone may non exist effective, with few alternatives amid a pandemic. A telephone review may not be as satisfying for a patient compared to a contiguous consultation. Reference Gupta5
The aim of the narrative review is to explore the subject of phone reviews and how therapeutic review radiographers might demand to adapt communication skills so that they can continue to effectively assess and manage radiotherapy patient treatment reactions remotely.
Method
The narrative literature review examines literature regarding telephone reviews and specific preparation/instruction of associated skills. The SCOPUS database was searched using a variety of championship keyword combinations (Table i). While telephone review is not always regarded as telehealth, Reference Rutledge, Kott, Schweickert, Poston, Fowler and Haney6 due to the wide variability in definition, the keywords 'telehealth' and 'telemedicine' were included to capture publications of all types which discussed skills/training required in healthcare telephone reviews. The date range was set from 2013 to January 2021 to include more contempo publications. Articles were rejected if they were not related to the healthcare system or had literature related just to virtual consultations. A total of 237 commodity abstracts were reviewed with 94 of the publications read in full. Xx-1 articles were deemed relevant to the give-and-take and were included along with seven additional references which were discovered from inside the 21 manufactures. A total of 28 publications are included in the review. The authors acknowledge that the narrative review, by its very nature, is non a systematic review and therefore provides but a focused sample of literature on the subject, however, information technology does serve to inspire debate and deepen understanding.
Discussion
Health professionals' feel of telehealth review
Gupta (2013) Reference Gupta5 commented that essential data for forming a diagnosis could be missed through telephone consultations, due to the absence of nonverbal advice such equally facial expressions, body linguistic communication and eye contact. The absence of these cues provides unique barriers to communication and the inability of reviewers to practise professional skill and judgement. Reference Irvine, Drew and Bowerseven Consequently, review radiographers tin no longer rely on heart contact and torso linguistic communication to read patients' comprehension and satisfaction, simply instead they must rely on subtle changes in the tone of the patient's voice. Differences in advice patterns such equally pace and blazon of discourse, and reliance on visual cues by both provider and patient, peculiarly in communicating empathy, Reference Henry, Block, Ciesla, McGowan and Vozenilek8 can increment the take chances for distractions, misunderstandings and difficulty in edifice rapport with a patient. Background noises and service system failures are other complications that can make telephone interactions challenging. Reference Yliluoma and Palonen9 Furthermore, the modest handshake that a reviewer would commonly employ to greet a patient and convey respect can no longer be practised.
Some patients tin bear witness reluctance to convey their problems through a telephone review. Patients demand time, information and want their questions to be answered. They expect politeness, empathy and human touch Reference Shendurnikar and Thakkar10 but information technology can be extremely challenging to recognise and sympathise feelings through the tone of a patient's vocalization and empathise accordingly. A qualitative study of xv patients past Knudsen et al. (2018) Reference Knudsen, de Thurah and Lomborgxi reported that while many patients enjoyed the flexibility and convenience of telephone reviews, some patients found it easier and more comfortable to talk about their problems contiguous. These 'reluctant patients', as they were categorised by Knudsen et al., valued the interrelatedness, feeling that the contact served to build a closer relationship with their health professionals and viewed phone communication every bit a reduced form of chat, leading to a distanced relationship. The report institute that in these patients there was a perception that the telephone follow-upward benefited the arrangement rather than the private and they felt that they were treated equally a 'number' rather than a person. Reference Knudsen, de Thurah and Lomborg11 Attila (2017) Reference Attila12 interviewed 58 physicians, mainly radiologists, discovering that radiologists too felt that telephone reviews depersonalised the doctor–patient human relationship, oft to the point where it almost terminates, resulting in incomplete clinical information existence acquired. In dissimilarity to these findings, Rodler et al. (2020), Reference Rodler, Apfelbeck and Schulz13 who received survey responses from 92 of 101 uro-oncologic patients (92% response rate) regarding telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, constitute this consultation method to be highly accepted. They acknowledged that while hearing impairment was a barrier in telehealth, virtual advice and help from relatives aided in alleviating this bulwark. Even so, the majority of patients felt that this method of review would not exist favourable later on the acute crisis of COVID-nineteen has passed. Reference Rodler, Apfelbeck and Schulz13 Therefore this report, in alignment with the previous studies, demonstrates that patients experience that contiguous reviews are very important, specially where treatment decisions are beingness made. The study determined that patients ultimately value personal interactions with health professionals and concluded that telephone reviews should be counterbalanced betwixt the need for distancing and sustaining personal patient relationships which is also applicable to patients undergoing radiotherapy and attending radiographer-led handling review clinics.
Interestingly, Larson et al. (2018), Reference Larson, Rosen and Wilson14 who conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of telehealth reviews with adult cancer patients, concluded that telehealth reviews in conjunction with supplementary interventions, are at to the lowest degree as effective at improving quality of life scores in patients undergoing cancer treatment as in-person reviews. Eleven eligible studies were included where a measurable global quality of life scale or questionnaire was utilized. Reference Larson, Rosen and Wilson14 They concluded that an added do good of telehealth reviews was the power to reach patients in rural locations who may struggle to attend in-person appointments. A limitation of the review was the small number of studies and the fact that 6 of the 11 included studies involved only breast cancer patients, the findings may therefore not truly reflect the experiences of patients with a variety of circuitous issues associated with a variety of cancer diagnoses.
Wellness professional grooming to accost phone review skills
The Wellness and Care Professions Quango (HCPC) Standards of proficiency for radiographers, paragraph 8, state that radiographers must be able to communicate effectively. Health professionals routinely receive grooming in communication skills, but this does not necessarily include the specificities of telephone communication. Reference Seale, Ragbourne and Purkiss Bejarano15 Some of the reviewed literature, mainly related to medical training, have assessed the short-term consequence of interventions aimed at improving phone consultation skills.
Medical training
Saba et al. (2014) Reference Saba, Chou and Satterfield16 studied and assessed the outcomes of a specific model of telephone advice preparation within healthcare, implementing a 'Telephone Follow-up Curriculum' which encouraged students' patient-centred skills. Students and faculty both reported improvement in students' agreement of, and attitudes towards telephone follow-upwards. The majority of students agreed or strongly agreed that they learned well-nigh patient wellness behaviours (77%), that their ability to provide patient teaching improved (71%), and that these communication skills will be relevant to futurity patient encounters (94%). Reference Saba, Chou and Satterfieldxvi More than recently, Seale et al. (2019) Reference Seale, Ragbourne and Purkiss Bejarano15 conducted a report with 50 undergraduate medical students where one-half of the students undertook specific phone training (combination of ane h session including PowerPoint and a practical component) followed by a brusque simulation session 7–fourteen days later on. All 25 students felt positive about the learning experience and felt they would use aspects of the grooming in their office as junior doctors. Compared to the untrained group, students felt more than confident and prioritised their task listing in alignment with the clinical skills team. Reference Seale, Ragbourne and Purkiss Bejarano15 However, some gaps were nonetheless identified in the trained group and the authors concluded that more than extensive education and practise of these skills was required. All students agreed that this specific phone teaching was an important component and should be added as a standard within medical programmes. Reference Seale, Ragbourne and Purkiss Bejaranofifteen
Hindman et al. (2020), Reference Hindman, Kochis and Apfel17 using a convenience sample of tertiary-twelvemonth medical students, divided students into a control and intervention grouping where the intervention involved teaching of specific phone medicine curriculum. Students in the intervention group had a significantly higher mean score on a simulated Objective Structured Clinical Test (OSCE) compared to the control group. Jonas et al. Reference Jonas, Durning, Zebrowski and Ciminoeighteen also piloted a tailored telehealth curriculum for 149 third-year medical students finding similar results. McDaniel et al. Reference McDaniel, Molloy and Hindman19 adult telephone triage curriculum for their 3rd and 4th year medical students (74 students) where students self-reported that this teaching increased their knowledge (73%) and was engaging (86%). Other authors who have provided show-based models for integration of telehealth curriculum into their medical programmes include Pathipati et al., Reference Pathipati, Azad and Jethwani20 Rienits et al., Reference Rienits, Teuss and Bonney21 Vasquez-Cevallos Reference Vasquez-Cevallos, Bobokova, Bautista-Valarezo, Dávalos-Batallas and Hernando22 and Walker et al. Reference Walker, Echternacht and Brophy23
Omoruyi et al. (2018) Reference Omoruyi, Dunkle, Dendy, McHugh and Barratt24 explored the challenges of telecommunications for patients requiring interpretation due to language barriers and stressed the demand for educational interventions, which consider this aspect of patient intendance. They specifically looked at the impact of introducing a 1-hour interactive educational intervention to medical students regarding bug related to live versus remote interpreter direction. Utilising control and intervention cohorts, they reviewed students' telephone interpreter skills using actual patient encounters mail service-intervention. In comparing to the command groups, the intervention group felt more competent, provided clearer information at the optimal pace and excelled in closing out conversations appropriately.
Veterinary grooming
Sheats et al. Reference Sheats, Hammond and Kedrowicz25 who analysed 25 phone calls of terminal year veterinary students, also identified gaps in their telephone communication, terminal that specific instruction is needed to improve case review, preparation in addressing questions or concerns, post-obit of organisational protocols forth with listening and reflection skills related to demonstration of empathy. Grevemeyer et al. Reference Grevemeyer, Betance and Artemiou26 stress the importance of specific phone preparation for veterinary students and discuss their programme which incorporates the Calgary–Cambridge Guide (CCG) as a conceptual framework for this tailored communication skills preparation which includes practically simulated telephone communication.
Nurse training
Chike-Harris Reference Chike-Harris27 discusses the integration of telehealth into a nursing plan curriculum using eight competencies provided by the National Organisation of Nurse Practitioner Faculties for telehealth instruction. Telehealth curriculum including didactic and simulated learning was integrated into all years of the nursing programme. Student pre-test/post-tests scores increased significantly and the feedback from students was very positive. The potential requirement for early education in this surface area of practice was evidenced by Glinkowski et al. Reference Glinkowski, Pawłowska and Kozłowska28 who found, through surveying nursing students, that only the final year students believed telenursing may improve nursing practise, years 1 and 2 students may require further didactics regarding the benefits. Lister et al. (2018) Reference Lister, Vaughn, Brennan-Cook, Molloy, Kuszajewski and Shaw29 and Listing et al. (2019) Reference List, Saxon, Lehman, Frank and Toole30 through modifying their nursing curriculum to include telehealth, demonstrated that even small-scale modifications to the existing curriculum can improve student confidence in this aspect of their exercise. Other nursing programmes incorporating telehealth simulation have also demonstrated comeback noesis gain through this adaptation of curriculum Reference Mennenga, Johansen, Foerster and Tschetter31 . Rutledge et al., Reference Rutledge, Kott, Schweickert, Poston, Fowler and Haney6 based on their feel, outline a range of comprehensive topics and techniques which they advocate including in telehealth nursing curriculum.
Allied health professional (AHP) training
Few studies in the narrative review included AHP-specific telephone skills training. Gustin et al. Reference Gustin, Kott and Rutledge32 describe the implementation of online learning and imitation training within an interprofessional module including advanced practice nurses, graduate wellness professionals and undergraduate dental hygiene students (103 participants). This intervention demonstrated improvement in all aspects of knowledge and students scored college in their simulation encounters post-intervention. However, it should be noted that this teaching focused more on video communication rather than phone communication though arguably these skills would apply to both scenarios. Gustin et al. Reference Gustin, Kott and Rutledge32 conclude that, based on educatee comments and pre-intervention knowledge scores, at that place is a strong need for training in telehealth in all healthcare professions. The study supports the notion that telehealth etiquette is not intuitive and needs to exist formally taught as function of all healthcare programmes. Randell et al. Reference Randall, Steinheider and Isaacson33 also assessed a telehealth intervention as function of an interprofessional curriculum including occupational therapists, physiotherapists and student nurse practitioners. They ended that the intervention resulted in increasingly positive perceptions regarding the utilize of telehealth for patient review though qualitative student data indicated that students perceived telehealth as 'an added bulwark to interacting with the patient and with other members of the squad' (p. 350). Reference Randall, Steinheider and Isaacson33 Randell et al. also focused on video communication rather than telephone communication.
The narrative review demonstrates that while there may exist a limited number of publications specifically addressing telephone skills training in allied health professions, including therapeutic radiography, in that location is a stiff need for specific high-quality training in the surface area. While telehealth, including phone skills training, is increasingly being integrated into healthcare programmes, Reference Camhi, Herweck and Perone34 this appears to be mainly occurring in medical and nursing programmes. Publications reviewed consistently demonstrate that the development and integration of evidence-based phone skills grooming, improves student confidence, sensation, knowledge and skills in this area of practice. Reference Vaona, Pappas, Grewal, Ajaz, Majeed and Car4 Ideally the preparation might be incorporated into all years of undergraduate therapeutic radiography programmes Reference Saba, Chou and Satterfield16 with a combination of multiple teaching modalities including didactic and faux education. Reference Vaona, Pappas, Grewal, Ajaz, Majeed and Car4,Reference Stovel, Gabarin, Cavalcanti and Abrams35 Imitation education ideally would involve the use of standardised patients and cover areas including the importance of 'appearance, distractors, privacy, nonverbal and verbal communication and strategies to effectively limited empathy' (p. 89). Reference Gustin, Kott and Rutledge32 This tailored learning may exist ideally placed in interprofessional modules throughout the curriculum as all allied health professionals need to develop effective communication skills.
While the bulk of studies focused on the student outcomes and demonstrated very positive findings, very few studies actually explored how the learning translated to the quality of patient experience. More research might be undertaken to assess current therapeutic radiography training with direct assessment of its impact on patient care. Moving forrard, aptly called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may prove useful to enable evaluation of long-term retention of skills and tangible benefits to patient quality of intendance. Few studies to date have captured the experiences of patients post-grooming and determined the true do good of preparation to the patient experience and wellbeing.
There is an opportunity inside telehealth to enhance access to intendance, quality of care and satisfaction for both patients and reviewers. Reference Rodler, Apfelbeck and Schulz13 While health professionals routinely receive training in advice and reviewing skills, this does not necessarily include the specificities of telephone communication. Phone reviews require the same degree of thoroughness and conscientious clinical judgment as contiguous consultations. The standards of education and training for college teaching programmes might be refreshed by the HCPC to ensure that student radiographers are achieving refreshed standards of proficiency in this dimension of communication. The student standards of proficiency might be evidenced through simulated practice moderated by experienced therapeutic radiographers. Reference Chambers, Hickey, Borghini and McKeown36
It is well established that therapeutic radiographers should be well prepared, engaged and courteous when undertaking reviews. They should be friendly and warm and not make patients feel rushed. Reference Vidal-Alaball, Acosta-Roja and Pastor Hernández37 Asking open-ended questions, constructive listening, appropriate praise, providing enough information as function of advice and finally checking the patient's agreement, are all fundamental areas of communication during a review. Reference Shendurnikar and Thakkar10 Ultimately, therapeutic review radiographers may need further training in telehealth to enhance their advice skills and and so make up for the lack of visual stimuli. Reference Rothwell, Ellington, Planalp and Crouch38 Understanding the barriers that inhibit radiographer and patient communication tin provide an opportunity to eliminate them. Radiographers need to larn telehealth consultation skills in order to thrive in an increasingly pressurised health system that demands the delivery of high-quality, high-book health care inside the confines of a shrinking health care workforce. The distinct differences between telehealth and face-to-face consultations necessitate a need to provide guidelines and recommendations to educate both health professionals and patients on how they tin can best participate in telephone reviews. Reference Vidal-Alaball, Acosta-Roja and Pastor Hernández37 The employ of competency-based training for telephone reviews will facilitate loftier-quality, safe and constructive consultations Reference Lum, van Galen and Car39 especially if telehealth becomes the new mail service-COVID-19 normal.
Conclusion
On-treatment reviews, whether contiguous or on the telephone, between therapeutic review radiographers and patients are about human connection and engagement and should ever be viewed as such to provide empathetic, loftier-quality intendance to patients and their loved ones. Reference Houchens and Tipirneni40 Telephone reviews can be convenient and effectively resourceful for both radiographers and patients, merely advice barriers practise be which can limit the ability of telehealth to match certain aspects of the face-to-confront review clinics. The long-term effects, such as the apparent safe afforded by home-based reviews during the pandemic and the effectiveness of telephone communication for patients undergoing radiotherapy, are yet to be fully realised. Reference Leung, Lin, Chow and Harky41 Multiple teaching modalities including simulation are ideal for didactics telephone-specific skills and content, demonstrating comeback in educatee knowledge, competence and confidence.
Perhaps there is a requirement for a nationwide consultation event to seek the views of radiographers, stakeholders and service users regarding how to strengthen the standards of proficiency aligned to telehealth/phone communication. Reference Chambers, Hickey, Borghini and McKeown36 Future studies might focus on investigating farther the blazon of teaching methods needed whilst developing phone consultation models and validating assessment tools. Reference Van Galen, Wang, Nanayakkara, Paranjape, Kramer and Car42 PROMs may be a useful undertaking for future preparation evaluations to help determine that effective patient care is beingness maintained. Given that remote consultation is becoming more prevalent, it would appear to exist good practice to development and enhance the telehealth curriculum in therapeutic radiography.
Acknowledgements
The authors give thanks the staff of the Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Wellness and Social Care Trust, for their support.
Financial Back up
This study received no specific grant from whatsoever funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
References
Murray, Due south , Gilleece, TM , Shepherd, PH. Evaluating the effectiveness of the clinical enquiry radiographer undertaking the on-treatment review of clinical trial patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Radiother Pract 2019; xviii (ii): 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F , Cimadevila, B , Garcia-Comesaña, J et al. Telephone consultation in primary care: a retrospective two-twelvemonth observational analysis of a public healthcare system. J Health Organ Manage 2018; 32 (2): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaet, D , Clearfield, R , Sabin, JE , Skimming, K , on behalf of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs American Medical Association. Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (ten): 1136–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaona, A , Pappas, Y , Grewal, RS , Ajaz, One thousand , Majeed, A , Car, J. Preparation interventions for improving telephone consultation skills in clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; i (ane): CD010034.Google ScholarPubMed
Rutledge, CM , Kott, M , Schweickert, PA , Poston, R , Fowler, C , Haney, TS. Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: electric current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017; 8: 399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irvine, A , Drew, P , Bower, P et al. Are in that location interactional differences between telephone and confront-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies. J Affective Disord 2020; 265: 120–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, BW , Block, DE , Ciesla, JR , McGowan, BA , Vozenilek, JA. Clinician behaviors in telehealth care delivery: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ 2017; 22 (four): 869–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yliluoma, P , Palonen, M. Telenurses' experiences of interaction with patients and family members: nurse–caller interaction via telephone. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 34 (3): 675–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shendurnikar, N , Thakkar, PA. Communication skills to ensure patient satisfaction. Indian J Pediatr 2013; 80 (eleven): 938–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, LR , de Thurah, A , Lomborg, 1000. Experiences with Telehealth followup in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Interview Study. Arthritis Care Res 2018; seventy (9): 1366–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attila, B. The touch of telemedicine on the development of doctor-patient relationship based on interviews conducted among physicians. Lege Artis Med 2017; 27 (4–v): 186–192.Google Scholar
Rodler, S , Apfelbeck, M , Schulz, GB et al. Telehealth in Uro-oncology beyond the pandemic: toll or lifesaver? Eur Urol Focus 2020; half dozen (v): 1097–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, JL , Rosen, AB , Wilson, FA. The effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-assay. Telemed e-Health 2018; 24 (six): 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seale, J , Ragbourne, SC , Purkiss Bejarano, N et al. Training last year medical students in telephone communication and prioritization skills: an evaluation in the faux surroundings. Med Teach 2019; 41 (ix): 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saba, GW , Chou, CL , Satterfield, J et al. Teaching patient-centered communication skills: a phone follow-upwardly curriculum for medical students. Med Educ Online 2014; 19: 22522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hindman, DJ , Kochis, SR , Apfel, A et al. Improving medical students' OSCE performance in telehealth: the effects of a phone medicine curriculum. Acad Med 2020; 95 (12): 1908–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonas, CE , Durning, SJ , Zebrowski, C , Cimino, F. An interdisciplinary, multi-establishment telehealth grade for third-year medical students. Acad Med 2019; 94 (6): 833–837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, LM , Molloy, M , Hindman, DJ et al. Phone it in: a medical pupil primer on telemedicine consultation in pediatrics. MedEdPORTAL 2021; 17: 11067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathipati, Equally , Azad, TD , Jethwani, K. Telemedical instruction: training digital natives in telemedicine. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (7): e193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasquez-Cevallos, L , Bobokova, J , Bautista-Valarezo, Due east , Dávalos-Batallas, Five , Hernando, ME. Telemedicine in medical training in Ecuador. In: 2017 IEEE 2d Ecuador Technical Capacity Meeting (ETCM). U.s.: IEEEXplore, 2017: ane–5.Google Scholar
Walker, C , Echternacht, H , Brophy, PD. Model for medical student introductory telemedicine instruction. Telemed e-Health 2019; 25 (8): 717–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omoruyi, EA , Dunkle, J , Dendy, C , McHugh, E , Barratt, MS. Cross talk: evaluation of a curriculum to teach medical students how to utilise telephone interpreter services. Acad Pediatr 2018; 18 (2): 214–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheats, MK , Hammond, S , Kedrowicz, AA. Analysis of final year veterinarian students' telephone communication skills at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Sci 2018; five (four): 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grevemeyer, B , Betance, L , Artemiou, East. A telephone communication skills exercise for veterinary students: experiences, challenges, and opportunities. J Vet Medical Educ 2016; 43 (2): 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chike-Harris, KE. Telehealth teaching of nurse practitioner students. J Nurse Pract 2021; 17 (3): 310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinkowski, W , Pawłowska, 1000 , Kozłowska, Fifty. Telehealth and telenursing perception and knowledge among university students of nursing in Poland. Telemed east-Wellness 2013; 19 (7): 523–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, 1000 , Vaughn, J , Brennan-Cook, J , Molloy, Yard , Kuszajewski, M , Shaw, RJ. Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students. Nurse Educ Pract 2018; 29: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
List, BA , Saxon, R , Lehman, D , Frank, C , Toole, KP. Improving telehealth knowledge in nurse practitioner training for rural and underserved populations. J Nurs Educ 2019; 58 (one): 57–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennenga, HA , Johansen, 50 , Foerster, B , Tschetter, L. Using simulation to improve pupil and faculty knowledge of telehealth and rural characteristics. Nurs Educ Perspect 2016; 37 (5):287–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustin, TS , Kott, K , Rutledge, C. Telehealth etiquette grooming: a guideline for preparing interprofessional teams for successful encounters. Nurse Educ 2020; 45 (2): 88–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, K , Steinheider, B , Isaacson, G et al. Measuring noesis, acceptance, and perceptions of telehealth in an interprofessional curriculum for student nurse practitioners, occupational therapists, and physical therapists. J Interact Learn Res 2016; 27 (four): 339–353.Google Scholar
Camhi, SS , Herweck, A , Perone, H. Telehealth training is essential to intendance for underserved populations: a medical student perspective. Med Sci Educ 2020; 30 (iii): 1287–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovel, RG , Gabarin, Northward , Cavalcanti, RB , Abrams, H. Curricular needs for training telemedicine physicians: a scoping review. Med Teach 2020; 42 (11): 1234–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, Yard , Hickey, G , Borghini, G , McKeown, R. Preparation for Practice: The Office of the HCPC's Standards of Education and Grooming in Ensuring that Newly Qualified Professionals are Fit to Practice. London: Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education Kingston University and St George'southward, University of London, 2009.Google Scholar
Vidal-Alaball, J , Acosta-Roja, R , Pastor Hernández, Due north et al. Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Aten Primaria 2020; 52 (half dozen): 418–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, East , Ellington, Fifty , Planalp, S , Crouch, B. Exploring challenges to telehealth communication by specialists in poison information. Qual Health Res 2012; 22 (1): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lum, E , van Galen, LS , Motorcar, J. Competency-based training for entrustment in telehealth consultations. Pediatr Clin North Am 2020; 67 (4): 735–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houchens, Due north , Tipirneni, R. Compassionate communication amid the COVID-19 pandemic. J Hosp Med 2020; 15 (7): 437–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, MST , Lin, SG , Chow, J , Harky, A. COVID-19 and Oncology: service transformation during pandemic. Cancer Med 2020; 9 (19): 7161–7171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Galen, LS , Wang, CJ , Nanayakkara, Pow , Paranjape, K , Kramer, MH , Car, J. Telehealth requires expansion of physicians' communication competencies preparation. Med Teach 2019; 41 (six):714–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Source: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-radiotherapy-in-practice/article/narrative-review-exploring-the-professional-practice-training-requirement-of-therapeutic-radiographers-undertaking-effective-remotetelephone-review-clinics-in-place-of-facetoface-radiographerled-review-clinics-during-the-covid19-pandemic/D452BEA258FD2F85188B3B48D859CEEB
0 Response to "Read Telehealth Requires Expansion of Physiciansã¢â‚¬â„¢ Communication Competencies Training"
Post a Comment